↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Appetite stimulants for people with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
Title
Appetite stimulants for people with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008190.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruth Chinuck, Jane Dewar, David R Baldwin, Elizabeth Hendron

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 263 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 17%
Student > Bachelor 35 13%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 86 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 13%
Psychology 19 7%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 93 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,496,964
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,206
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,564
of 241,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#155
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.