↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Manual therapy with exercise for neck pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Manual therapy with exercise for neck pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011225
Authors

Jordan Miller, Anita Gross, Theresa M Kay, Nadine Graham, Stephen J Burnie, Charles H Goldsmith, Gert Brønfort, Jan L Hoving, Joy MacDermid

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 20%
Psychology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 25 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,752,443
of 16,064,848 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,414
of 11,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,842
of 195,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,064,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.