↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics for acute pyelonephritis in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
47 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antibiotics for acute pyelonephritis in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003772.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Strohmeier, Elisabeth M Hodson, Narelle S Willis, Angela C Webster, Jonathan C Craig

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections in infants. The most severe form of UTI is acute pyelonephritis, which results in significant acute morbidity and may cause permanent kidney damage. There remains uncertainty regarding the optimum antibiotic regimen, route of administration and duration of treatment. This is an update of a review that was first published in 2003 and updated in 2005 and 2007.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 190 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Master 22 12%
Other 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 32 17%
Unknown 61 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 69 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#822,875
of 26,451,184 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,442
of 13,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,425
of 240,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,451,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.