↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antibiotics for acute pyelonephritis in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antibiotics for acute pyelonephritis in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003772.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Strohmeier, Elisabeth M Hodson, Narelle S Willis, Angela C Webster, Jonathan C Craig

Abstract

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common bacterial infections in infants. The most severe form of UTI is acute pyelonephritis, which results in significant acute morbidity and may cause permanent kidney damage. There remains uncertainty regarding the optimum antibiotic regimen, route of administration and duration of treatment. This is an update of a review that was first published in 2003 and updated in 2005 and 2007.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 19%
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 9 7%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 29 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#479,769
of 17,947,665 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,078
of 11,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,932
of 201,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,947,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.