↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006930.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Jessica Vaughan, Brian R Davidson

Abstract

A pneumoperitoneum of 12 to 16 mm Hg is used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lower pressures are claimed to be safe and effective in decreasing cardiopulmonary complications and pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 200 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 17%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Other 16 8%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 48 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 92 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Engineering 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 57 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#17,724,033
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,278
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,967
of 242,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#217
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.