The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Low pressure versus standard pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006930.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Jessica Vaughan, Brian R Davidson |
| Abstract |
A pneumoperitoneum of 12 to 16 mm Hg is used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lower pressures are claimed to be safe and effective in decreasing cardiopulmonary complications and pain. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 229 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 10% |
| Researcher | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 18% |
| Unknown | 66 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Psychology | 5 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 76 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,011,936
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,818
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,234
of 249,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#206
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.