The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Topical antifungal treatments for tinea cruris and tinea corporis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009992.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdy El‐Gohary, Esther J van Zuuren, Zbys Fedorowicz, Hana Burgess, Liz Doney, Beth Stuart, Michael Moore, Paul Little |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 16% |
| Bahrain | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 36% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 427 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 14% |
| Researcher | 33 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 29 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 80 | 19% |
| Unknown | 136 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 144 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 33 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 144 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,064,477
of 26,385,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,997
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,956
of 242,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.