↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
Antioxidant supplementation for lung disease in cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007020.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oana Ciofu, Jens Lykkesfeldt

Abstract

Airway infection leads to progressive damage of the lungs in cystic fibrosis and oxidative stress has been implicated in the etiology. Supplementation of antioxidant micronutrients (vitamin E, vitamin C, ß-carotene and selenium) or glutathione may therefore potentially help maintain an oxidant-antioxidant balance. Current literature suggests a relationship between oxidative status and lung function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 179 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 11 6%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 39 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 48 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,359,981
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,576
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,805
of 242,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#145
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.