↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Group-based parent training programmes for improving parental psychosocial health

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
463 Mendeley
Title
Group-based parent training programmes for improving parental psychosocial health
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002020.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jane Barlow, Nadja Smailagic, Nick Huband, Verena Roloff, Cathy Bennett

Abstract

Parental psychosocial health can have a significant effect on the parent-child relationship, with consequences for the later psychological health of the child. Parenting programmes have been shown to have an impact on the emotional and behavioural adjustment of children, but there have been no reviews to date of their impact on parental psychosocial wellbeing.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 463 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 456 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 106 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 15%
Researcher 67 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 8%
Other 77 17%
Unknown 70 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 120 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 94 20%
Social Sciences 63 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Other 40 9%
Unknown 83 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,111,954
of 16,384,501 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,001
of 11,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,042
of 197,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,384,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.