| Title |
Methods of intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009060.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Myura Nagendran, Clare D Toon, Gian Piero Guerrini, Murat Zinnuroglu, Brian R Davidson |
| Abstract |
Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation may decrease pain in people undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, the optimal method to administer the local anaesthetic is unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 142 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 23% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,859,545
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,251
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,572
of 238,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#220
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.