| Title |
Magnesium sulphate for preventing preterm birth in threatened preterm labour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001060.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Caroline A Crowther, Julie Brown, Christopher JD McKinlay, Philippa Middleton |
| Abstract |
Magnesium sulphate has been used in some settings as a tocolytic agent to inhibit uterine activity in women in preterm labour with the aim of preventing preterm birth. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 344 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 69 | 20% |
| Unknown | 90 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 159 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 10% |
| Psychology | 12 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Unknown | 92 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,050,146
of 24,770,025 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,416
of 12,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,427
of 236,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,770,025 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.