↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Photodynamic therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002030.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Wormald, Jennifer R Evans, Liam L Smeeth, Katherine S Henshaw

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 39 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#2,672,938
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,339
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,417
of 67,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.