The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Needle syringe programmes and opioid substitution therapy for preventing hepatitis C transmission in people who inject drugs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012021.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy Platt, Silvia Minozzi, Jennifer Reed, Peter Vickerman, Holly Hagan, Clare French, Ashly Jordan, Louisa Degenhardt, Vivian Hope, Sharon Hutchinson, Lisa Maher, Norah Palmateer, Avril Taylor, Julie Bruneau, Matthew Hickman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| France | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 468 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 468 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 14% |
| Researcher | 60 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 9% |
| Other | 30 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 6% |
| Other | 73 | 16% |
| Unknown | 172 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 6% |
| Psychology | 19 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 62 | 13% |
| Unknown | 195 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 180. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#240,021
of 26,562,579 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#385
of 13,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,747
of 330,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,562,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.