↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Post-embryo transfer interventions for assisted reproduction technology cycles

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Post-embryo transfer interventions for assisted reproduction technology cycles
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006567.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Leah R Peters, Arianna D'Angelo, Hassan N Sallam, Roger J Hart, Hesham G Al-Inany

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Other 10 6%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 47 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Psychology 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 52 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2016.
All research outputs
#15,304,580
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,779
of 12,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,467
of 236,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#209
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.