↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial vascular malformations in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
Title
Computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial vascular malformations in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009372.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin B Josephson, Philip M White, Ashma Krishan, Rustam Al‐Shahi Salman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Researcher 17 8%
Other 14 7%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 73 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 85 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,523,781
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,793
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,436
of 248,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.