↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial vascular malformations in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography for detection of intracranial vascular malformations in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009372.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colin B Josephson, Philip M White, Ashma Krishan, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 24 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 30 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,266,581
of 15,298,914 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,905
of 11,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,457
of 202,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,298,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.