| Title |
Time course for blood pressure lowering of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010052.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niousha Ghamami, Sandy Hsiang Yu Chiang, Colin Dormuth, James M Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 18% |
| Unknown | 35 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,914,616
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,605
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,741
of 236,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.