| Title |
Time course for blood pressure lowering of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010052.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niousha Ghamami, Sandy Hsiang Yu Chiang, Colin Dormuth, James M Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 17% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 46 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,617,249
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,160
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,113
of 248,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.