↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Statins for acute coronary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Statins for acute coronary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006870.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noah Vale, Alain J Nordmann, Gregory G Schwartz, James de Lemos, Furio Colivicchi, Frank den Hartog, Petr Ostadal, Stella M Macin, Anho H Liem, Edward J Mills, Neera Bhatnagar, Heiner C Bucher, Matthias Briel

Abstract

The early period following the onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents a critical stage of coronary heart disease, with a high risk of recurrent events and deaths. The short-term effects of early treatment with statins on patient-relevant outcomes in patients suffering from ACS are unclear. This is an update of a review previously published in 2011.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 224 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 18%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Other 18 8%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 54 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,777,653
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,274
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,405
of 237,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#125
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.