↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Amphotericin B lipid soluble formulations versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
Title
Amphotericin B lipid soluble formulations versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000969.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helle Krogh Johansen, Peter C Gøtzsche

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Croatia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 110 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Other 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 31 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 35 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,811,404
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,625
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,617
of 249,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#174
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.