↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Amphotericin B lipid soluble formulations versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Amphotericin B lipid soluble formulations versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000969.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helle Krogh Johansen, Peter C Gøtzsche

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Croatia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 77 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 15%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Professor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 25 31%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Unspecified 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 15 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,979,492
of 16,995,670 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,521
of 11,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,580
of 207,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#172
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,995,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.