↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Amphotericin B lipid soluble formulations versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Amphotericin B lipid soluble formulations versus amphotericin B in cancer patients with neutropenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000969.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helle Krogh Johansen, Peter C Gøtzsche

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Croatia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 90 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 15%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 26 28%
Unknown 19 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 21 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,103,297
of 20,610,267 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,116
of 12,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,650
of 214,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#168
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,610,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.