↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Haemophilus influenzae oral vaccination for preventing acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Haemophilus influenzae oral vaccination for preventing acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010010.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teo E, House H, Lockhart K, Purchuri SN, Pushparajah J, Cripps AW, van Driel ML

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 25%
Student > Postgraduate 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 12 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,136,554
of 17,145,811 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,486
of 11,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,866
of 208,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,145,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.