↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
Title
Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002303.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

E Andrea Nelson, Sally EM Bell-Syer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 217 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 21%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 9%
Other 53 24%
Unknown 30 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Engineering 8 4%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 36 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,952,478
of 16,300,707 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,653
of 11,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,457
of 205,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#98
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,300,707 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.