| Title |
Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002303.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E Andrea Nelson, Sally EM Bell-Syer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 56% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 313 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 311 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 22% |
| Unknown | 78 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 79 | 25% |
| Engineering | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 84 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#4,138,133
of 24,764,450 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,703
of 12,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,838
of 244,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,764,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.