↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaginal dilator therapy for women receiving pelvic radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
Title
Vaginal dilator therapy for women receiving pelvic radiotherapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007291.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracie Miles, Nick Johnson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 226 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Researcher 16 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 55 24%
Unknown 69 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 16%
Unspecified 14 6%
Psychology 13 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 76 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,031,651
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,472
of 12,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,121
of 239,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.