↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaginal dilator therapy for women receiving pelvic radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Vaginal dilator therapy for women receiving pelvic radiotherapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007291.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracie Miles, Nick Johnson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 173 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 18%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 41 23%
Unknown 42 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 17%
Psychology 12 7%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 49 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,646,204
of 18,964,669 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,926
of 11,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,042
of 212,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,964,669 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.