↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
Title
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009803.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Huang, Qing He, Li J Yang, Guan J Liu, Alexander Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 257 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Master 28 11%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 52 20%
Unknown 83 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 15%
Unspecified 8 3%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 90 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,664,506
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,778
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,052
of 243,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.