↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
Title
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009803.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Huang, Qing He, Li J Yang, Guan J Liu, Alexander Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 200 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Student > Master 26 13%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 46 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 18%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 52 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#994,358
of 16,307,759 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,703
of 11,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,103
of 205,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,307,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.