↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
68 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
344 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
490 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

France Légaré, Dawn Stacey, Stéphane Turcotte, Marie-Joëlle Cossi, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Ian D Graham, Anne Lyddiatt, Mary C Politi, Richard Thomson, Glyn Elwyn, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 490 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 1%
United States 6 1%
Canada 5 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 470 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 88 18%
Researcher 68 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 13%
Student > Bachelor 40 8%
Other 30 6%
Other 115 23%
Unknown 83 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 169 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 60 12%
Psychology 35 7%
Social Sciences 28 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 2%
Other 67 14%
Unknown 122 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#653,138
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,321
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,329
of 246,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.