↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (excluding Group B Streptococcal and HIV)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
Title
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (excluding Group B Streptococcal and HIV)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004070.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pisake Lumbiganon, Jadsada Thinkhamrop, Bandit Thinkhamrop, Jorge E Tolosa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 186 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 18%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 44 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Social Sciences 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 52 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,934,094
of 21,730,136 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,608
of 12,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,065
of 181,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#106
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,730,136 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.