The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (excluding Group B Streptococcal and HIV)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004070.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pisake Lumbiganon, Jadsada Thinkhamrop, Bandit Thinkhamrop, Jorge E Tolosa |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 60% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 17% |
| Unknown | 86 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Unknown | 94 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,809,278
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,365
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,456
of 258,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.