| Title |
Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001478.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linjie Zhang, Sílvio OM Prietsch, Inge Axelsson, Scott A Halperin |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 17% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Hungary | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 220 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 43 | 19% |
| Unknown | 60 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 14% |
| Unknown | 67 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,306,516
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,960
of 12,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,625
of 252,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.