The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001478.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linjie Zhang, Sílvio OM Prietsch, Inge Axelsson, Scott A Halperin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Kuwait | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 74% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 245 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 45 | 18% |
| Unknown | 74 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 82 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,493,059
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,026
of 13,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,323
of 261,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.