↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
179 Mendeley
Title
Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001478.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linjie Zhang, Sílvio OM Prietsch, Inge Axelsson, Scott A Halperin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 174 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 35 20%
Unknown 42 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 48 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,033,225
of 19,394,767 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,562
of 11,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,122
of 219,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,394,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.