↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to promote referral, uptake and adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to promote referral, uptake and adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012813
Authors

Jane Young, Rachel E Jordan, Peymane Adab, Alexandra Enocson, Kate Jolly

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 24 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#3,367,124
of 21,955,070 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,852
of 12,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,024
of 299,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#155
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,955,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.