| Title |
Intramedullary nails for extracapsular hip fractures in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004961.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph M Queally, Ella Harris, Helen HG Handoll, Martyn J Parker |
| Abstract |
Intramedullary nails may be used for the surgical fixation of extracapsular hip fractures in adults. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005 and last updated in 2008. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 352 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 13% |
| Researcher | 45 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 28 | 8% |
| Other | 73 | 21% |
| Unknown | 91 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 170 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 6% |
| Engineering | 11 | 3% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 110 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2014.
All research outputs
#5,639,634
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,502
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,689
of 243,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.