↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical versus conservative treatment for acute injuries of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
Title
Surgical versus conservative treatment for acute injuries of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000380.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gino MMJ Kerkhoffs, Helen HG Handoll, Rob de Bie, Brian H Rowe, Peter AA Struijs

Abstract

Ankle sprains are one of the most commonly treated musculoskeletal injuries. The three main treatment modalities for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries are immobilisation with plaster cast or splint, 'functional treatment' comprising early mobilisation and use of an external support (e.g. ankle brace), and surgical repair or reconstruction.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 307 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 20%
Student > Master 48 15%
Other 29 9%
Researcher 27 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 8%
Other 53 17%
Unknown 71 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 17%
Sports and Recreations 26 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Psychology 7 2%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 86 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,442,992
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,085
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,744
of 74,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 74,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.