↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
40 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004013.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas BL Lam, Muhammad Imran Omar, Euan Fisher, Katie Gillies, Sara MacLennan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 226 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 17%
Student > Master 39 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Other 22 9%
Researcher 21 9%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 43 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 12%
Chemistry 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Other 37 16%
Unknown 52 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#587,675
of 16,663,134 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,503
of 11,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,464
of 213,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#29
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,663,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.