↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
36 X users
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short‐term catheterisation in hospitalised adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004013.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas BL Lam, Muhammad Imran Omar, Euan Fisher, Katie Gillies, Sara MacLennan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 300 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 16%
Student > Bachelor 43 14%
Other 27 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Researcher 25 8%
Other 47 15%
Unknown 90 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Chemistry 8 3%
Other 46 15%
Unknown 101 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,062,308
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,144
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,126
of 263,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.