| Title |
Orthodontic and orthopaedic treatment for anterior open bite in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005515.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Débora A Lentini‐Oliveira, Fernando R Carvalho, Clarissa Garcia Rodrigues, Qingsong Ye, Rongdang Hu, Hideko Minami‐Sugaya, Luciane BC Carvalho, Lucila BF Prado, Gilmar F Prado |
| Abstract |
Anterior open bite occurs when there is a lack of vertical overlap of the upper and lower incisors. The aetiology is multifactorial including: oral habits, unfavourable growth patterns, enlarged lymphatic tissue with mouth breathing. Several treatments have been proposed to correct this malocclusion, but interventions are not supported by strong scientific evidence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 374 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 47 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 19% |
| Unknown | 125 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 186 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Unknown | 127 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,366,650
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,878
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,434
of 263,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#48
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.