| Title |
Orthodontic and orthopaedic treatment for anterior open bite in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005515.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Débora A Lentini-Oliveira, Fernando R Carvalho, Clarissa Garcia Rodrigues, Qingsong Ye, Rongdang Hu, Hideko Minami-Sugaya, Luciane BC Carvalho, Lucila BF Prado, Gilmar F Prado |
| Abstract |
Anterior open bite occurs when there is a lack of vertical overlap of the upper and lower incisors. The aetiology is multifactorial including: oral habits, unfavourable growth patterns, enlarged lymphatic tissue with mouth breathing. Several treatments have been proposed to correct this malocclusion, but interventions are not supported by strong scientific evidence. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 350 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 55 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 69 | 19% |
| Unknown | 109 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 184 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Psychology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 7% |
| Unknown | 111 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,162,104
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,619
of 12,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,310
of 253,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.