↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical management of functional bladder outlet obstruction in adults with neurogenic bladder dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
Title
Surgical management of functional bladder outlet obstruction in adults with neurogenic bladder dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004927.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elaine Utomo, Jan Groen, Bertil FM Blok

Abstract

The most common type of functional bladder outlet obstruction in patients with neurogenic bladder is detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). The lack of co-ordination between the bladder and the external urethral sphincter muscle (EUS) in DSD can result in poor bladder emptying and high bladder pressures, which may eventually lead to progressive renal damage.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Postgraduate 23 9%
Other 65 25%
Unknown 51 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 12%
Psychology 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 28 11%
Unknown 70 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,005,299
of 17,740,717 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,430
of 11,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,312
of 217,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#165
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,740,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.