| Title |
Surgical management of functional bladder outlet obstruction in adults with neurogenic bladder dysfunction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004927.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elaine Utomo, Jan Groen, Bertil FM Blok |
| Abstract |
The most common type of functional bladder outlet obstruction in patients with neurogenic bladder is detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia (DSD). The lack of co-ordination between the bladder and the external urethral sphincter muscle (EUS) in DSD can result in poor bladder emptying and high bladder pressures, which may eventually lead to progressive renal damage. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 299 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Researcher | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 72 | 24% |
| Unknown | 76 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Unknown | 94 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,859,040
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,235
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,355
of 240,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#176
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.