| Title |
Electrotherapy modalities for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011324 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew J Page, Sally Green, Sharon Kramer, Renea V Johnston, Brodwen McBain, Rachelle Buchbinder |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 23% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 546 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 544 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 101 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 95 | 17% |
| Other | 37 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 108 | 20% |
| Unknown | 138 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 184 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 105 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 13 | 2% |
| Psychology | 13 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 11% |
| Unknown | 162 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2023.
All research outputs
#847,305
of 24,221,802 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,718
of 12,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,352
of 258,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,221,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.