↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Electrotherapy modalities for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
33 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
419 Mendeley
Title
Electrotherapy modalities for adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J Page, Sally Green, Sharon Kramer, Renea V Johnston, Brodwen McBain, Rachelle Buchbinder

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 416 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 92 22%
Student > Master 87 21%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 7%
Other 82 20%
Unknown 66 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 169 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 92 22%
Sports and Recreations 12 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 83 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#588,902
of 17,585,248 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,441
of 11,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,153
of 217,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,585,248 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.