↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Fetal assessment methods for improving neonatal and maternal outcomes in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Fetal assessment methods for improving neonatal and maternal outcomes in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010209.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gemma C Sharp, Sarah J Stock, Jane E Norman

Abstract

Fetal assessment following preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) may result in earlier delivery due to earlier detection of fetal compromise. However, early delivery may not always be in the fetal or maternal interest, and the effectiveness of different fetal assessment methods in improving neonatal and maternal outcomes is uncertain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 161 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Master 17 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 13 8%
Other 40 25%
Unknown 40 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Psychology 6 4%
Unspecified 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 46 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,858,200
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,130
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,328
of 253,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#76
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.