↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgery for stress urinary incontinence due to presumed sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Surgery for stress urinary incontinence due to presumed sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008306.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laercio A Silva, Régis B Andriolo, Álvaro N Atallah, Edina MK da Silva

Abstract

Incontinence after prostatectomy for benign or malignant disease is a well-known and often a feared outcome. Although small degrees of incidental incontinence may go virtually unnoticed, larger degrees of incontinence can have a major impact on a man's quality of life.Conceptually, post-prostatectomy incontinence may be caused by sphincter malfunction or bladder dysfunction, or both. Most men with post-prostatectomy incontinence (60% to 100%) have stress urinary incontinence, which is involuntary urinary leakage on effort or exertion, or on sneezing or coughing. This may be due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency and may be treated with surgery for optimal management of incontinence. Detrusor dysfunction is more common after surgery for benign prostatic disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
India 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 219 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Researcher 26 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Postgraduate 21 9%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 46 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 11%
Psychology 8 4%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 51 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,487,688
of 17,421,713 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,799
of 11,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,617
of 218,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,421,713 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,684 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.