↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
Title
High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009701.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aaron Budden, Lily JY Chen, Amanda Henry

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 199 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 17%
Researcher 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 16 8%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Psychology 6 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 39 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,713,478
of 17,125,476 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,382
of 11,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,968
of 217,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#123
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,125,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,627 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.