| Title |
High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009701.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aaron Budden, Lily JY Chen, Amanda Henry |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Kenya | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 263 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 11% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 20% |
| Unknown | 58 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,861,828
of 23,993,601 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,417
of 12,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,275
of 258,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,993,601 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.