↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intranasal fentanyl for the management of acute pain in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
Title
Intranasal fentanyl for the management of acute pain in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009942.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian Murphy, Ronan O'Sullivan, Abel Wakai, Timothy S Grant, Michael J Barrett, John Cronin, Siobhan C McCoy, Jeffrey Hom, Nandini Kandamany

Abstract

Pain is the most common symptom in the emergency setting; however, timely management of acute pain in children continues to be suboptimal. Intranasal drug delivery has emerged as an alternative method of achieving quicker drug delivery without adding to the distress of a child by inserting an intravenous cannula.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 244 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 38 15%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 61 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 14%
Psychology 13 5%
Social Sciences 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 77 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2021.
All research outputs
#759,825
of 21,745,818 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,665
of 12,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,856
of 226,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 227 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,745,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 227 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.