| Title |
Intranasal fentanyl for the management of acute pain in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009942.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian Murphy, Ronan O'Sullivan, Abel Wakai, Timothy S Grant, Michael J Barrett, John Cronin, Siobhan C McCoy, Jeffrey Hom, Nandini Kandamany |
| Abstract |
Pain is the most common symptom in the emergency setting; however, timely management of acute pain in children continues to be suboptimal. Intranasal drug delivery has emerged as an alternative method of achieving quicker drug delivery without adding to the distress of a child by inserting an intravenous cannula. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 23% |
| Ireland | 5 | 13% |
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 316 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 314 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 13% |
| Researcher | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 16% |
| Unknown | 107 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 14% |
| Psychology | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 9% |
| Unknown | 123 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#935,906
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,841
of 13,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,043
of 268,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.