↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
535 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
841 Mendeley
citeulike
12 CiteULike
Title
Interactive Health Communication Applications for people with chronic disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004274.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Murray, Joanne Burns, Sharon See Tai, Rosalind Lai, Irwin Nazareth

Abstract

Interactive Health Communication Applications (IHCAs) are computer-based, usually web-based, information packages for patients that combine health information with at least one of social support, decision support, or behaviour change support. These are innovations in health care and their effects on health are uncertain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 841 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
United Kingdom 10 1%
Canada 6 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Norway 4 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Other 11 1%
Unknown 779 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 136 16%
Researcher 136 16%
Student > Master 123 15%
Student > Bachelor 79 9%
Other 45 5%
Other 188 22%
Unknown 134 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 234 28%
Psychology 98 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 81 10%
Social Sciences 75 9%
Computer Science 49 6%
Other 134 16%
Unknown 170 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,860,064
of 21,326,488 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,574
of 12,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,109
of 113,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,326,488 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.