| Title |
Non-pharmaceutical management of respiratory morbidity in children with severe global developmental delay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010382.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naomi R Winfield, Nicki J Barker, Esme R Turner, Gemma L Quin |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 415 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 68 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 11% |
| Researcher | 42 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 79 | 19% |
| Unknown | 127 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 80 | 19% |
| Psychology | 16 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 44 | 11% |
| Unknown | 154 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,347,637
of 24,171,511 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,865
of 12,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,347
of 263,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,171,511 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.