↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-pharmaceutical management of respiratory morbidity in children with severe global developmental delay

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
330 Mendeley
Title
Non-pharmaceutical management of respiratory morbidity in children with severe global developmental delay
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010382.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi R Winfield, Nicki J Barker, Esme R Turner, Gemma L Quin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 328 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 18%
Researcher 43 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 7%
Other 66 20%
Unknown 71 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 20%
Psychology 19 6%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 96 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,469,090
of 18,968,999 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,588
of 11,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,678
of 246,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#154
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,968,999 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.