↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Immunosuppressive treatment for idiopathic membranous nephropathy in adults with nephrotic syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004293.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yizhi Chen, Arrigo Schieppati, Xiangmei Chen, Guangyan Cai, Javier Zamora, Giovanni A Giuliano, Norbert Braun, Annalisa Perna

Abstract

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) is the most common form of nephrotic syndrome in adults. The disease shows a benign or indolent course in the majority of patients, with a rate of spontaneous complete or partial remission of nephrotic syndrome as high as 30% or more. Despite this, 30% to 40% of patients progress toward end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) within five to 15 years. The efficacy and safety of immunosuppression for IMN with nephrotic syndrome are still controversial. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2004.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Other 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 29 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 35 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,137,090
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,926
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,743
of 255,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#176
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.