↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
28 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000112.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luchin F Wong, T Flint Porter, James R Scott

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 163 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 29 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 33 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#890,851
of 18,478,499 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,229
of 11,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,245
of 241,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,478,499 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.