| Title |
Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000112.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luchin F Wong, T Flint Porter, James R Scott |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 21% |
| Australia | 3 | 16% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Malawi | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
| Scientists | 4 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 48 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,280,931
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,935
of 12,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,233
of 260,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.