| Title |
Prenatal versus postnatal repair procedures for spina bifida for improving infant and maternal outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008825.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rosalie M Grivell, Chad Andersen, Jodie M Dodd |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 325 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 13% |
| Researcher | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 15% |
| Unknown | 95 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Psychology | 12 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 10% |
| Unknown | 100 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,449,456
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,539
of 13,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,278
of 275,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#205
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.