↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical approaches for cervical spine facet dislocations in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Surgical approaches for cervical spine facet dislocations in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008129.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Del Curto, Marcel Jun Tamaoki, Délio E Martins, Eduardo Barros Puertas, João Carlos Belloti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 28 22%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Neuroscience 6 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 33 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#9,618,907
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,516
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,712
of 229,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#202
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.