↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical approaches for cervical spine facet dislocations in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Surgical approaches for cervical spine facet dislocations in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008129.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Del Curto, Marcel Jun Tamaoki, Délio E Martins, Eduardo Barros Puertas, João Carlos Belloti

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 166 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 50 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 54 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,219,905
of 21,321,610 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,159
of 12,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,664
of 252,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#223
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,321,610 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.