↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Surgical approaches for cervical spine facet dislocations in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
Surgical approaches for cervical spine facet dislocations in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008129.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Del Curto, Marcel Jun Tamaoki, Délio E Martins, Eduardo Barros Puertas, João Carlos Belloti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 201 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 70 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 6 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 75 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2014.
All research outputs
#21,275,986
of 26,128,906 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,290
of 13,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,074
of 276,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#235
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,128,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.