Title |
Continuous positive airway pressure delivery interfaces for obstructive sleep apnoea
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005308.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ching Li Chai‐Coetzer, Anna Pathinathan, Brian J Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 165 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
Researcher | 17 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
Other | 36 | 21% |
Unknown | 53 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 39% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Engineering | 4 | 2% |
Psychology | 3 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 57 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,852,754
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,406
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,262
of 87,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.