↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

School policies for preventing smoking among young people

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
Title
School policies for preventing smoking among young people
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009990.pub2
Pubmed ID
25342250
Authors

Alessandro Coppo, Maria Rosaria Galanti, Livia Giordano, Daria Buscemi, Sven Bremberg, Fabrizio Faggiano

Abstract

School tobacco policies (STPs) might prove to be a promising strategy to prevent smoking initiation among adolescents, as there is evidence that the school environment can influence young people to smoke. STPs are cheap, relatively easy to implement and have a wide reach, but it is not clear whether this approach is effective in preventing smoking uptake.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 229 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 18%
Researcher 38 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 15 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 59 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 25%
Psychology 26 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 11%
Social Sciences 21 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 3%
Other 28 12%
Unknown 67 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#12,797,387
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,779
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,424
of 260,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#205
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.