↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

School policies for preventing smoking among young people

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
Title
School policies for preventing smoking among young people
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009990.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Coppo, Maria Rosaria Galanti, Livia Giordano, Daria Buscemi, Sven Bremberg, Fabrizio Faggiano

Abstract

School tobacco policies (STPs) might prove to be a promising strategy to prevent smoking initiation among adolescents, as there is evidence that the school environment can influence young people to smoke. STPs are cheap, relatively easy to implement and have a wide reach, but it is not clear whether this approach is effective in preventing smoking uptake.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 190 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 20%
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 32 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 12%
Psychology 23 12%
Social Sciences 21 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 38 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2018.
All research outputs
#10,552,434
of 18,901,471 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,378
of 11,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,828
of 247,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#206
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,901,471 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.