↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
394 Mendeley
Title
Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Kyrgiou, Antonios Athanasiou, Ilkka E J Kalliala, Maria Paraskevaidi, Anita Mitra, Pierre PL Martin‐Hirsch, Marc Arbyn, Phillip Bennett, Evangelos Paraskevaidis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 394 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 394 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 12%
Student > Master 45 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Researcher 33 8%
Other 23 6%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 150 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Social Sciences 9 2%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 163 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#868,285
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,690
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,224
of 341,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.