The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Opioids for neonates receiving mechanical ventilation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004212.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Roberto Bellù, Koert A de Waal, Rinaldo Zanini |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 244 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
Researcher | 23 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 23 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
Other | 59 | 24% |
Unknown | 73 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 10% |
Psychology | 10 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
Other | 26 | 10% |
Unknown | 81 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,471,255
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,375
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,766
of 168,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.