↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Opioids for neonates receiving mechanical ventilation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Opioids for neonates receiving mechanical ventilation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004212.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Bellù, Koert A de Waal, Rinaldo Zanini

Timeline
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 244 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 14%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 59 24%
Unknown 73 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 10%
Psychology 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 81 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,471,255
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,375
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,766
of 168,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.