↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007697.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Ang, Karen K L Chan, Andrew Bryant, Raj Naik, Heather O Dickinson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 116 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,471,255
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,375
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,580
of 120,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.