↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral calorie supplements for cystic fibrosis.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Oral calorie supplements for cystic fibrosis.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000406.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalind L Smyth, Oli Rayner, Smyth RL, Rayner O

Abstract

Poor nutrition occurs frequently in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) and is associated with other adverse outcomes. Oral calorie supplements are used to increase total daily calorie intake and improve weight gain. However, they are expensive and there are concerns they may reduce the amount of food eaten and not improve overall energy intake.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 80 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 17%
Psychology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 16 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,790,988
of 22,230,789 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,038
of 12,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,002
of 254,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,230,789 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.