↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for speech disorder in Friedreich ataxia and other hereditary ataxia syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
366 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for speech disorder in Friedreich ataxia and other hereditary ataxia syndromes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008953.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam P Vogel, Joanne Folker, Matthew L Poole

Abstract

Hereditary ataxia syndromes can result in significant speech impairment, a symptom thought to be responsive to treatment. The type of speech impairment most commonly reported in hereditary ataxias is dysarthria. Dysarthria is a collective term referring to a group of movement disorders affecting the muscular control of speech. Dysarthria affects the ability of individuals to communicate and to participate in society. This in turn reduces quality of life. Given the harmful impact of speech disorder on a person's functioning, treatment of speech impairment in these conditions is important and evidence-based interventions are needed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 366 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 364 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 15%
Student > Bachelor 48 13%
Researcher 45 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 68 19%
Unknown 87 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 13%
Psychology 26 7%
Social Sciences 22 6%
Neuroscience 20 5%
Other 55 15%
Unknown 106 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2022.
All research outputs
#5,504,061
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,335
of 12,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,334
of 261,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#158
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.