↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for speech disorder in Friedreich ataxia and other hereditary ataxia syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
402 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for speech disorder in Friedreich ataxia and other hereditary ataxia syndromes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008953.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam P Vogel, Joanne Folker, Matthew L Poole

Abstract

Hereditary ataxia syndromes can result in significant speech impairment, a symptom thought to be responsive to treatment. The type of speech impairment most commonly reported in hereditary ataxias is dysarthria. Dysarthria is a collective term referring to a group of movement disorders affecting the muscular control of speech. Dysarthria affects the ability of individuals to communicate and to participate in society. This in turn reduces quality of life. Given the harmful impact of speech disorder on a person's functioning, treatment of speech impairment in these conditions is important and evidence-based interventions are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 400 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 14%
Student > Bachelor 49 12%
Researcher 47 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 5%
Other 69 17%
Unknown 114 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 12%
Psychology 27 7%
Social Sciences 23 6%
Neuroscience 20 5%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 136 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,265,283
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,568
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,053
of 274,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#158
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.