Title |
Wound drainage following groin dissection for malignant disease in adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010933.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David R Thomson, Hazim Sadideen, Dominic Furniss |
Abstract |
Groin dissection is commonly performed for the treatment of a variety of cancers, including melanoma, and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, penis or vulva. It is uncertain whether insertion of a drain reduces complication rates, and, if used, the optimum time for drain removal after surgery is also unknown. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 15% |
Other | 15 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 27% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 25% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
Psychology | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 43 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#8,296,727
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,927
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,809
of 271,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#213
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.