↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological and nutritional treatment for McArdle disease (Glycogen Storage Disease type V)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological and nutritional treatment for McArdle disease (Glycogen Storage Disease type V)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003458.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosaline Quinlivan, Andrea Martinuzzi, Benedikt Schoser

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 205 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Student > Bachelor 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 42 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Sports and Recreations 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Other 35 17%
Unknown 50 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,826,456
of 13,845,249 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,731
of 10,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,333
of 231,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#192
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,845,249 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.