↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pharmacological and nutritional treatment for McArdle disease (Glycogen Storage Disease type V)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacological and nutritional treatment for McArdle disease (Glycogen Storage Disease type V)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003458.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosaline Quinlivan, Andrea Martinuzzi, Benedikt Schoser

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 252 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 18%
Student > Bachelor 42 17%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 68 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 6%
Sports and Recreations 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 77 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#12,009,530
of 21,331,034 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,538
of 12,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,152
of 252,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#208
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,331,034 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,097 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.