| Title |
Chemotherapy with cetuximab versus chemotherapy alone for chemotherapy-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009948.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zu-Yao Yang, Li Liu, Chen Mao, Xin-Yin Wu, Ya-Fang Huang, Xue-Feng Hu, Jin-Ling Tang |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 149 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 52 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 55 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2023.
All research outputs
#5,875,582
of 22,770,070 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,659
of 12,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,781
of 360,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#175
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,770,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.